If you’ve ever wondered why government decisions often seem to work against your interests – why your power bills keep rising while energy companies make record profits, why housing remains unaffordable while property investors get tax breaks, or why your local health services are cut while convention centres receive millions – then you need to understand how lobbying works in New Zealand.

Every year, decisions made in Wellington transfer billions of your tax dollars to wealthy interests, not because it’s good for you or your community, but because professional lobbyists have gained special access to ministers and shaped policies to benefit their clients. While you’re working hard to make ends meet, lobbyists are meeting with politicians behind closed doors, ensuring that government policies favour those who can afford to pay for influence.

What Is Lobbying in New Zealand?

Lobbying in New Zealand operates in what has been described as the “wild west” – an entirely unregulated environment where wealthy interests can exert extraordinary influence over political decisions with virtually no transparency or accountability. Unlike most developed nations, New Zealand has no mandatory register of lobbyists, no cooling-off periods for politicians and public servants moving into lobbying roles, and no rules governing how lobbyists interact with decision-makers.

At its core, lobbying involves individuals or firms being paid to influence government policy on behalf of clients who can afford their services. These lobbyists arrange meetings with ministers and public servants, draft legislation changes, prepare submissions to select committees, and use their insider knowledge and connections to advance their clients’ interests. The industry has grown exponentially in recent years in New Zealand, with lobbying firms able to charge up to hundreds of thousands of dollars to private corporations and, disturbingly, some government agencies.

The lobbying ecosystem in New Zealand is dominated by former political insiders who move seamlessly through what is known as the “revolving door” between government and the private sector. For example, four out of five people who held the position of Prime Minister’s Chief of Staff between 2017 and 2023 were lobbyists. These individuals take their intimate knowledge of how government works, their personal relationships with decision-makers, and often confidential information straight from the Beehive to lobbying firms, where they immediately begin advocating for corporate clients.

What makes New Zealand’s situation particularly concerning is the informal, relationship-based nature of the lobbying that occurs. Text messages between lobbyists and ministers reveal a culture of “mates,” “comrades,” and “brothers” – a cosy arrangement where access to power is determined by personal connections and the ability to pay for influence. Lobbyists invite ministerial advisors to drinks, dinners, and sporting events, building relationships that translate into policy influence behind closed doors.

How Lobbying Creates the Corruption of Democratic Decision-Making

The fundamental problem with unregulated lobbying is that it creates a two-tier democracy where those with money have vastly superior access to decision-makers compared to ordinary citizens and community organisations. When ministers allow lobbyists representing wealthy interests to dominate their time and attention, the public interest inevitably suffers.

Community organisations who represent you and the average person often do not have the time or money to try to carry out lobbying activities. In most cases, business and wealthy interests have lobbying all their own way because there is no-one to represent the average person, and so the other side of the story is never properly considered. Community organisations are not in a position to make anonymous or declared donations to political parties, so they are not able, by this means, to gain lobbying access to Ministers and their staff or to the Public Servants that provide advice. Those community organisations who could provide a different view usually do not know what is under discussion behind closed doors. If they do find out, they may be reluctant to criticise what is being proposed because they could put at risk any Government funding they receive or annoy well-off potential donors.

Because New Zealand’s lobbying industry operates with little transparency or oversight, it tilts the playing field of policymaking toward the rich and powerful. Decisions that affect all New Zealanders can end up being unduly influenced by vested interests rather than the broader public good. As The Integrity Institute has argued, our democracy frequently experiences a form of corruption when lobbyists persuade the government to quietly drop promised policies or introduce new policies that favour a narrow interest. Vested interests may win big benefits, but this often comes at the expense of the community and future generations.

The Illusion of Economic Benefits

Lobbyists tell politicians that if they look after the rich, this will create jobs and stimulate economic growth. This sounds good to politicians, so they use these claims when explaining to the public the decisions they have made. In most cases, these claims are just an illusion, and at best, resources are moved from one sector of the economy to another.

If politicians were genuinely interested in creating jobs for all New Zealanders, they would not allow each year tens of thousands of immigrants and visiting foreign workers to take jobs which could easily be done by New Zealand citizens if employers were prepared to offer adequate pay and conditions. Politicians like immigration because it brings money into the country and stimulates economic activity. This improves their re-election chances, so over the years they have ignored the various negative consequences of some of their immigration policies. For example, a low wage economy with rapidly increasing house prices and rents and inadequate infrastructure and limited essential services is not in the best interest of most people.

Distortion of the Policy Process

Ministers have very little time, ability, knowledge, and experience to be able to make informed decisions that are in the best interests of you and the whole country. Under these circumstances, it is easy to influence a decision if a lobbyist is the only person who can get or buy access to the public servants who give advice and to the Minister who ultimately makes the decision.

Ministers have very little time each week to make decisions, but they allow lobbyists, who mainly represent those with money, to take up most of this time. The reasons for this are that they personally know the lobbyist or access has been purchased by donating money, or they know that organisations representing businesses, farmers, and other vested interests have the money, spokespeople, and public relations budgets that can attack a political party or help get it re-elected. Some businesses have journalists and social media commentators on retainers, and they are ready to say whatever is required.

Ministers may also know that those lobbying them are financially supporting their favourite sport or arts organisation, but this support would be withdrawn if they act in the public interest and not in the interest of those doing the lobbying. Ministers may also want to take advantage of a range of inducements such as corporate box hospitality at a major sporting event. They may also want to get a high-paying job when they leave Parliament, so they keep in good with lobbying firms and major companies.

Lobbyists are often the middlemen who offer Ministers donations and other inducements for their political party without those that the lobbyist represents and the political party being directly involved.

Ministers rely heavily on advice from public servants who are supposed to provide “free and frank” advice in the public interest. However, this process is frequently corrupted when lobbyists gain privileged access to both ministers and the officials advising them. With limited time and resources, ministers often hear only one side of the story – the side promoted by well-funded lobbyists – while community voices remain unheard.

The devastating consequences of this distorted process are evident in numerous policy failures. The collapse of finance companies and the leaky buildings crisis both resulted from lobbying that led to weak regulations and poor decision-making. In both cases, lobbyists successfully advocated for “light-handed” regulation that benefited their clients’ short-term profits while leaving taxpayers and ratepayers to clean up tens of billions of dollars in damages. As is often the case, profits were privatised while losses were socialised.

The Covid-19 Wage Subsidy Scandal

Perhaps the most egregious example of lobbying’s corruption of public policy occurred during the Covid-19 pandemic. In March 2020, Business New Zealand executives met with Treasury officials, the Prime Minister, and the Minister of Finance to propose their preferred wage subsidy scheme. Two weeks later, Cabinet approved a scheme that was remarkably similar to what the business lobby had requested – and which proved to be wide open to abuse. About $19bn was quickly paid out but about $10bn of this was wrongly obtained or retained – much of it transferred to businesses that didn’t necessarily need it. The Ministry of Social Development (MSD) ignored recommendations that they write to recipients requesting them to confirm their eligibility or make a repayment.

While businesses received tens of billions of dollars in subsidies and 35 other assistance measures, those renting and on low incomes were granted only $400 million in loans by MSD. This massive transfer of public money to businesses, often regardless of need, contributed to a 43% increase in residential property prices over two years and a 14% rise in the share market over nine months, further entrenching inequality.

Capture of Regulatory Processes

Lobbying has resulted in the systematic weakening of public health and environmental protections. The abolition of the independent Public Health Commission came after intensive lobbying by alcohol, tobacco, business, and farming interests. Similarly, improvements to drinking water standards were blocked and an independent Food Safety Authority was eliminated following industry pressure. These decisions left New Zealand ill-prepared for public health challenges, including the Covid-19 pandemic.

More recently, investigations have revealed how lobbyists have been embedded within regulatory agencies themselves. One lobbying firm was found to be working inside the Commerce Commission offices during inquiries into the supermarket and energy industries – inquiries that had major implications for the firm’s corporate clients. This represents a fundamental conflict of interest that undermines public trust in regulatory processes.

Undermining Democratic Accountability

The lack of transparency around lobbying means the public has no way of knowing who is influencing political decisions or how. Unlike Australia, where lobbyists must be registered and their clients disclosed, New Zealanders are kept in the dark about which interests are shaping government policy. This opacity extends to the media, where lobbyists frequently appear as political commentators without disclosing their clients, further distorting public discourse.

The “revolving door” between government and lobbying creates particularly acute conflicts of interest. When ministers and senior officials know they can walk straight into lucrative lobbying roles, it creates incentives for them to maintain good relationships with potential future employers rather than regulate in the public interest.

Examples abound: former Justice Minister Kris Faafoi established a lobbying firm less than three months after leaving Cabinet; former Minister Kiri Allan registered her consultancy business just two weeks after resigning as Justice Minister while still serving as an MP.

Excluding Community Voices

While corporate interests have lobbying “all their own way,” community organisations representing the public interest face systematic exclusion. These groups often lack the resources to engage in sustained advocacy and face threats to their charitable status if they engage in “political” activities. Requests from charitable organisations to meet with ministers are routinely rejected or ignored, while farming lobbyists might meet with the Prime Minister 20 times per year.

This imbalance means that crucial perspectives – those representing future generations, environmental sustainability, public health, and social equity – are systematically excluded from decision-making processes. The result is policy that favours short-term corporate profits over long-term public wellbeing.

What The Integrity Institute is Doing

The Integrity Institute is taking a comprehensive approach to addressing the corruption of democratic decision-making by lobbying interests. Our work focuses on three key areas: A) Creating transparency on lobbyist, B) Research, and C) Advocacy for reform. Below is an elaboration on these three methods.

A) Creating transparency through a Lobbying and Influence Register

In the absence of any official transparency requirements, The Integrity Institute has created New Zealand’s first comprehensive Lobbying and Influence Register. This groundbreaking initiative serves as a one-stop shop for information about the political power and activities of lobbyists, corporations, think tanks, and interest groups.

Currently, the register contains over 220 entities, including lobbying firms, businesses, law firms, and other influential organisations. Each entry is being developed through detailed investigations that examine:

• The entity’s history of political influence
• Connections to current and former politicians
• Political donations and financial relationships
• Lobbying activities and client relationships
• Conflicts of interest
• Impact on specific policy decisions

This register represents a living repository of constantly updated information, partly reliant on crowdsourced intelligence from concerned citizens. While initial entries have been researched with assistance from artificial intelligence, we are committed to verifying and expanding this information through ongoing investigations.

B) Research and Investigation

The Integrity Institute has established a dedicated research workstream focused on investigating influential entities and their impact on New Zealand politics. Led by our researchers, this programme conducts in-depth investigations into how companies, lobbyists, and interest groups shape political outcomes.

Our research goes beyond simple documentation. We analyse patterns of influence, trace the flow of money and power, and expose the hidden relationships that create corruption in democratic decision-making. This includes examining:

• The “revolving door” between government and lobbying
• Secret political donations and their policy impacts
• Lobbying campaigns and their success in shaping legislation
• The exclusion of public interest voices from policy processes
• International comparisons with better-regulated jurisdictions

C) Advocacy for Reform

The Integrity Institute advocates for comprehensive reform of New Zealand’s lobbying laws to bring us in line with international best practice. Our reform agenda includes:

1. A Mandatory Lobbying Register: All professional lobbyists should be required to register and disclose their clients, the issues they are lobbying on, and whom they are meeting with in government.

2. Cooling-Off Periods: Former ministers, MPs, and senior public servants should be prohibited from lobbying for at least two years after leaving their positions. This would help shut the “revolving door” that enables conflicts of interest.

3. Transparency Requirements: All lobbying contacts with ministers and senior officials should be documented and made publicly available, going beyond the current limited disclosure in ministerial diaries.

4. Codes of Conduct: Establishing enforceable standards for lobbying behaviour, with real penalties for breaches.

5. Limiting Political Donations: Reforming the political donation system to reduce the ability of wealthy interests to buy influence through campaign contributions.

6. Protecting Public Interest Advocacy: Ensuring community organisations can engage in advocacy without threats to their charitable status, levelling the playing field between corporate and public interests.

7. Independent Oversight: Creating an independent body to monitor and enforce lobbying regulations, similar to systems in other developed nations.

Building Public Awareness

A crucial part of our work involves educating the public about how lobbying creates corruption in democratic decision-making. Through our research, publications, and media engagement, we work to:

• Expose specific cases of lobbying influence
• Highlight the costs to society of capture by vested interests
• Build public pressure for reform
• Support journalists and researchers investigating lobbying
• Provide resources for citizens to understand and challenge corporate influence

 A Comprehensive Bibliography on Lobbying in New Zealand

This bibliography provides a curated list of resources on the issue of lobbying in New Zealand. It encompasses academic analysis, investigative journalism, official reports, and international comparisons. The bibliography is in four parts: the first part is a list of the works by The Integrity Institute’s Bryce Edwards, then Part Two looks at the key journalistic investigations by Guyon Espiner, and Part Three details some other key articles published in the media, and then Part Four lists some relevant official reports on lobbying and reform.

The materials cover various facets of lobbying, including the “revolving door” phenomenon, regulatory deficits, the influence of lobbyists on policy-making, calls for reform, and specific case studies of lobbying in New Zealand. Each entry below have the bibliography details and a brief description of the item. Each part is in chronological date order.

Part One: Works by Dr Bryce Edwards

Bryce Edwards: “Unfettered lobbyist access to Beehive should be scrutinised.” Newsroom, 20 November 2017.

URL: https://newsroom.co.nz/2017/11/20/bryce-edwards-unfettered-lobbyists-under-suspicion/

Summary: This early column raises concerns about the implications of lobbyists’ unrestricted access to ministers and government, particularly how it could undermine the agenda and accountability of the then-new Labour-led government. It highlights the increased demand for lobbyists during government transitions and the rising public suspicion about their influence on democratic processes.

Bryce Edwards: “The rise of the hyper-partisan lobbyists in Wellington”. NZ Herald, 20 November 2017

URL: https://democracyproject.nz/2017/11/20/political-roundup-the-rise-of-the-hyper-partisan-lobbyists-in-wellington/

Summary: Examines Neale Jones’s swift transition from Jacinda Ardern’s Chief of Staff to director of Australian lobbying firm Hawker Britton. Discusses the emergence of “hyper-partisan” lobbying firms that align exclusively with one side of politics, unlike traditional firms that remained non-partisan. Highlights New Zealand’s lack of “cooling off” period regulations that exist in other democracies.

Bryce Edwards: “The Government’s revolving door for lobbyists”. 20 February 2018.

URL: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/political-roundup-the-governments-revolving-door-for-lobbyists/2U5HK2DGG2JBYS4W44R3XMOP7E/

Summary: Focuses on Gordon Jon Thompson, who worked as Jacinda Ardern’s acting Chief of Staff while maintaining his lobbying business, then returned directly to lobbying after four months. Also covers Wayne Eagleson’s transition from Bill English’s Chief of Staff to lobbying. Argues this “revolving door” creates conflicts of interest and calls for cooling-off periods like those in other countries.

Bryce Edwards: “More light on revolving door lobbyists”. Newsroom, 22 February 2018

URL: https://newsroom.co.nz/2018/02/22/opinion-why-we-should-know-more-about-our-revolving-door-lobbyists/

Summary: Argues that lobbyists operate with little public scrutiny by design, working behind the scenes to influence government for well-resourced interests. Discusses why lobbying receives limited media coverage, partly due to symbiotic relationships between journalists and PR professionals. Uses Thompson’s case to illustrate how government experience significantly enhances a lobbyist’s value.

Bryce Edwards: “Be transparent about pundits’ conflicts of interest”. Newsroom, 4 March 2018

URL: https://newsroom.co.nz/2018/03/04/the-conflicting-interests-of-commentators/

Summary: This article advocates for greater transparency regarding the potential conflicts of interest of political commentators and pundits. Edwards points out that many commentators have affiliations or work for lobbying firms, public relations companies, or other organizations with vested interests in the political discourse they are analyzing. He argues that audiences deserve to know about these connections to better evaluate the objectivity and potential biases in their commentary.

Bryce Edwards: “An unprotected and risky revolving door”. Newsroom, 1 April 2018

URL: https://newsroom.co.nz/2018/04/01/an-unprotected-and-risky-revolving-door/

Summary: Edwards continues to explore the theme of the “revolving door” between government and lobbying roles, labeling it as “unprotected and risky.” The article likely delves into the lack of regulation or cooling-off periods for former ministers, political staffers, and public servants transitioning into lobbying. It emphasizes the potential for cronyism, privileged access, and policy capture by special interests, arguing that this unregulated environment poses risks to New Zealand’s political integrity.

Bryce Edwards: “The role of corporate lobbying in NZ’s political process”. NZ Herald 4 March 2019

URL: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/political-roundup-the-role-of-corporate-lobbying-in-nzs-political-process/4LMRY7KLKNFOOGBVV5J3CH26FY/

Summary: This article examines the influence and mechanisms of corporate lobbying within New Zealand’s political system. It likely discusses how businesses and industry groups attempt to shape policy and legislation to their benefit. The piece may explore the various tactics used by corporate lobbyists, the resources at their disposal, and the implications of their influence on democratic processes and public interest.

Bryce Edwards: “Should we worry about lobbyists’ influence on the Government?” NZ Herald, 27 May 2019

URL: https://democracyproject.nz/2019/05/27/bryce-edwards-should-we-worry-about-lobbyists-influence-on-the-government/

Summary: This article poses the question of whether the influence exerted by lobbyists on the New Zealand Government is a cause for concern. It likely explores the arguments for and against lobbying, weighing the democratic right to advocate against the potential for undue influence, policy capture by wealthy or well-connected interests, and a lack of transparency. The piece probably calls for a public discussion on the appropriate level of influence lobbyists should have.

Bryce Edwards: “Have corporate lobbyists been running this government?” NZ Herald, 20 June 2019

URL: https://democracyproject.nz/2019/06/20/bryce-edwards-have-corporate-lobbyists-been-running-this-government/

Summary: This provocative piece questions the extent to which corporate lobbyists might be dictating government policy. Edwards likely presents observations or evidence suggesting that corporate interests have a significant, perhaps excessive, impact on decision-making. The article probably scrutinizes the relationship between lobbyists, corporations, and the government, raising concerns about whether the public good is being overshadowed by private, commercial agendas.

Bryce Edwards: “Vested interests in New Zealand politics are too big to ignore – we need a royal commission”. Guardian, 19 February 2020

URL: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/feb/19/vested-interests-in-new-zealand-politics-are-too-big-to-ignore-we-need-a-royal-commission

Summary: In this opinion piece for The Guardian, Bryce Edwards argues that the influence of vested interests in New Zealand politics has become so significant that it warrants a royal commission. He contends that issues like lobbying, party funding, and the “revolving door” are not being adequately addressed and that a high-level inquiry is needed to investigate these matters thoroughly and recommend comprehensive reforms to safeguard the integrity of the political system.

Bryce Edwards: “NZ’s latest political lobbying problems.” 19 February 2020.

URL: https://democracyproject.nz/2020/02/19/bryce-edwards-nzs-latest-political-lobbying-problems/

Summary: This article examines several contemporary lobbying issues, including the NZ First donations scandal and the involvement of lobbyists. It discusses potential conflicts of interest, such as lobbyists also being party fundraisers, and broader scandals within the Labour-led government involving lobbyists in advisory roles without adequate disclosure or regulation, contrasting New Zealand’s lax environment with stricter US rules.

Bryce Edwards: “The Government–lobbying revolving door.” NZ Herald, 13 November 2021.

URL: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/bryce-edwards-the-government-lobbying-revolving-door-just-keeps-on-turning/OK2TRISU6A2LAURUIC2KQKXX2Q/

Summary: Focusing on specific instances of the “revolving door,” where political insiders transition into lobbying roles, this piece discusses the public’s growing unease with this trend. It highlights cases like Tory Whanau and Neale Jones, criticizes the lack of regulation and “cooling-off” periods in New Zealand, and calls for restrictions on this practice.

Bryce Edwards: “Faafoi’s lobbying position should be illegal.” 8 October 2022.

URL: https://theintegrityinstitute.substack.com/p/186962_political-roundup-faafoi-s-lobbying-position-should-be-illegal

Summary: This article critically examines the move of former minister Kris Faafoi into a lobbying role shortly after leaving office. It argues that such transitions, enabled by New Zealand’s absence of mandatory cooling-off periods, should be prohibited to maintain public trust and prevent potential conflicts of interest.

Bryce Edwards: “Lobbyists use the revolving door into mayoral offices.” 18 October 2022.

URL: https://democracyproject.nz/2022/10/18/bryce-edwards-lobbyists-use-the-revolving-door-into-mayoral-offices/

Summary: This piece extends the discussion of the “revolving door” phenomenon beyond central government to New Zealand’s mayoral offices. It presents case studies, such as Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau and Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown, highlighting how individuals with lobbying backgrounds or connections are assuming influential roles in local government, often without sufficient scrutiny of potential conflicts of interest. The article calls for greater transparency regarding corporate connections in mayoral offices.

Bryce Edwards: “Momentum growing to reform lobbying laws.” 15 November 2022.

URL: https://democracyproject.nz/2022/11/15/bryce-edwards-momentum-growing-to-reform-lobbying-laws/

Summary: This article notes the increasing support from various quarters, including Transparency International NZ and even some within the lobbying industry, for the introduction of a lobbying register and other reforms. It highlights the Faafoi case as a catalyst and discusses calls for “cooling-off” periods and a code of conduct, reflecting a pre-2023 election atmosphere where reform seemed plausible.

Bryce Edwards: “Chris Hipkins hires a lobbyist to run the Beehive,” NZ Herald 1 February 2023.

Summary: This piece critiques Prime Minister Chris Hipkins’ decision to appoint Andrew Kirton, an individual with a background in corporate lobbying, as his Chief of Staff. It argues this continues a “democratically dangerous precedent” of lobbyists moving into senior government positions, highlighting the immense conflicts of interest and the lack of rules in New Zealand compared to other countries. The article calls for disclosure of lobbyists’ clients if they take on such roles.

Bryce Edwards: “Andrew Kirton’s past experience shines a bright light on lobbyists in politics”. NZ Herald 21 March 2023

URL: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/political-roundup-andrew-kirtons-past-experience-shines-a-bright-light-on-lobbyists-in-politics/CNGGYAFP3NDI5H4KCSIQRZ7U64/

Summary: This article uses the example of Andrew Kirton, a figure with a background in both politics (as a former Labour Party General Secretary) and lobbying, to illustrate the workings and potential issues of the lobbying industry in New Zealand. It examines Kirton’s career path as a case study to discuss the “revolving door,” the access and influence such individuals can wield, and the broader implications for transparency and fairness in politics.

Bryce Edwards: “Who will drain Wellington’s lobbying swamp?” 22 March 2023.

URL: https://democracyproject.nz/2023/03/22/bryce-edwards-who-will-drain-wellingtons-lobbying-swamp/

Summary: This commentary poses the critical question of which political leaders will take on the task of reforming lobbying practices and addressing cronyism in the capital. It outlines proposed reforms, including cooling-off periods, a lobbying register, codes of conduct for officials and lobbyists, and an independent Integrity Commissioner, emphasizing the need for political will and external pressure for change.

Bryce Edwards: “The Beehive’s revolving door and corporate mateship.” 23 March 2023.

URL: https://theintegrityinstitute.substack.com/p/187458_political-roundup-the-beehive-s-revolving-door-and-corporate-mateship

Summary: This article further explores the problematic “revolving door” between government roles and lobbying firms, emphasizing the close relationships between political insiders and corporate interests. It critiques the lack of regulation that allows these practices, which can undermine public trust and fair decision-making.

Bryce Edwards: “Demands on politicians to regulate lobbying ramp up.” Democracy Project, 3 April 2023.

URL: https://democracyproject.nz/2023/04/03/bryce-edwards-demands-on-politicians-to-regulate-lobbying-ramp-up/

Summary: This article describes the surge in public and media pressure on politicians to introduce comprehensive lobbying regulations in New Zealand. It discusses various reform proposals, including an anti-corruption commission, a lobbyist register, and stand-down periods, and highlights specific cases of lobbying influence, contrasting lobbyists’ defenses with public perception of unfair influence.

Bryce Edwards: “Victory for transparency in lobbying reforms.” RNZ, 4 April 2023.

URL: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/487343/bryce-edwards-victory-for-transparency-in-lobbying-reforms

Summary: This piece provides an overview of initial steps taken by the government in 2023 towards greater lobbying transparency, likely in response to public pressure. These included the abolition of swipe cards for lobbyists and a commitment to review lobbying rules, seen as tentative victories by transparency campaigners, though the substantive impact of immediate reforms was questioned.

Bryce Edwards: “More ex-Labour ministers move into lobbying.” 17 October 2023.

URL: https://democracyproject.nz/2023/10/17/bryce-edwards-more-ex-labour-ministers-move-into-lobbying/

Summary: This article highlights the continuing trend of former Labour ministers and government officials transitioning into lobbying roles after the 2023 election. It discusses specific cases like Kiri Allan and Stuart Nash, emphasizing the “revolving door” problem and the potential for conflicts of interest, and underscores the need for the ongoing Ministry of Justice review to address these issues.

Bryce Edwards: “Who’s advising the new National Government?” 19 October 2023.

URL: https://democracyproject.nz/2023/10/19/bryce-edwards-whos-advising-the-new-national-government/

Summary: This article scrutinizes the individuals advising the incoming National-led government, particularly those with backgrounds in lobbying and corporate PR. It raises questions about potential conflicts of interest and the influence of vested interests in the new administration, citing examples like Wayne Eagleson and Steven Joyce.

Bryce Edwards: “Should government departments be giving contracts to lobbying firms?” 9 November 2023.

URL: https://democracyproject.nz/2023/11/09/bryce-edwards-should-government-departments-be-giving-contracts-to-lobbying-firms/

Summary: This piece questions the appropriateness of New Zealand government departments awarding contracts to firms that also engage in lobbying activities. It highlights the case of SenateSHJ and the Commerce Commission, arguing that such arrangements create potential conflicts of interest and could grant private sector clients privileged access to decision-making processes, a practice that would be unacceptable in many other countries.

Bryce Edwards: “Lobbyists helping and influencing the new National government.” 15 November 2023.

URL: https://democracyproject.nz/2023/11/15/bryce-edwards-lobbyists-helping-and-influencing-the-new-national-government/

Summary: This article details how corporate lobbyists are positioning themselves to influence the new National-led government. It discusses the involvement of figures like Wayne Eagleson in staffing Beehive offices and the recruitment of politically connected individuals by lobbying firms. The piece also notes the ongoing Ministry of Justice research into lobbying regulation and some promises for reform by National.

Bryce Edwards: “Political donations, Lobbying, Labour Party recovery, the media’s performance, and National’s questionable reforms.” 19 December 2023.

URL: https://democracyproject.nz/2023/12/19/bryce-edwards-political-donations-lobbying-labour-party-recovery-the-medias-performance-and-nationals-questionable-reforms/

Summary: This comprehensive political roundup touches upon lobbying in the context of political donations and influence, particularly concerning the natural health sector’s relationship with NZ First and the repeal of the Therapeutic Products Act. It also discusses the role of former Prime Minister Bill English, now a consultant involved in lobbying, in reviewing state housing agency Kāinga Ora.

Bryce Edwards: “Christopher Luxon needs to raise standards in the Beehive” NZ Herald, 31 January 2024

URL: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/political-roundup-christopher-luxon-needs-to-raise-standards-in-the-beehive-bryce-edwards/53VUIP5YRNBLTKWQNKXRHUX5VE/

Summary: This article critiques the ethical standards and practices within the Beehive, particularly concerning lobbyists and political integrity. Edwards calls for specific actions or reforms that Luxon’s government could implement to enhance transparency, accountability, and public trust in political institutions, referencing recent events or ongoing concerns about lobbying and conflicts of interest.

Bryce Edwards: “Lobbying for Waikato’s medical school causing problems for the Govt.” 16 May 2024.

URL: https://democracyproject.nz/2024/05/16/bryce-edwards-lobbying-for-waikatos-medical-school-causing-problems-for-the-govt/

Summary: This article discusses the controversial lobbying efforts, notably by former National Minister Steven Joyce, on behalf of the University of Waikato to secure significant taxpayer funding for a third medical school. It highlights concerns about deal-making, the Auditor-General’s investigation into the university’s hiring of Joyce, and potential coalition government instability over the project.

Bryce Edwards: “What’s behind the Med Student cuts?” 6 June 2024.

URL: https://theintegrityinstitute.substack.com/p/whats-behind-the-med-student-cuts

Summary: This piece likely explores the context and potential influences, including lobbying, surrounding decisions related to medical student intake or funding, possibly linking to the broader debate about the Waikato medical school.

Bryce Edwards: “Lobbyist says $250,000 will stop ‘anything a government wants to do’.” NZ Herald, 13 June 2024.

URL: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/bryce-edwards-political-roundup-lobbyist-says-250000-will-stop-anything-a-government-wants-to-do/JWWAAG3MJREEVMQTRYWRHY5TY4/

Summary: This article analyses the state of lobbying regulation efforts in New Zealand as of mid-2024. It highlights a claim about the financial power of lobbying and discusses the faltering voluntary lobbyists’ code and the uncertain political will for mandatory regulations, indicating that the reform process initiated by the Ministry of Justice is at a crossroads.

Bryce Edwards: “The Rise and Fall of a top lobbying PR firm”. 31 July 2024

URL: https://theintegrityinstitute.substack.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-a-top-lobbying

Summary: Analyzes the closure of SenateSHJ, a major lobbying-PR firm that became controversial for conflicts of interest, including being paid over $300,000 by the Commerce Commission while representing clients in the same regulated industries. The firm’s strong ties to Labour made it vulnerable when National took power in 2023. Edwards argues the closure illustrates why lobbying needs better regulation.

Bryce Edwards: “Should a former Act gun lobbyist be in charge of gun control reforms?” 16 August 2024

URL: https://theintegrityinstitute.substack.com/p/should-a-former-act-gun-lobbyist

Summary: Challenges the appropriateness of appointing a former gun lobbyist to oversee gun reform policies, suggesting conflicts of interest.

Bryce Edwards: “Waikato Med School – National’s zombie ‘pet project’ won’t die.” 4 November 2024.

URL: https://theintegrityinstitute.substack.com/p/political-roundup-waikato-med-school

Summary: This article revisits the controversial Waikato medical school proposal, characterizing it as a persistent “pet project” for the National party, likely fueled by ongoing lobbying efforts despite previous criticisms and concerns about its viability and the processes involved.

Bryce Edwards: “Big tech’s political influence on debate and public watchdogs.” NZ Herald, 16 September 2024.

URL: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/big-techs-political-influence-on-debate-and-public-watchdogs-bryce-edwards-political-roundup/4LBOZ32ZGNFUBOKIN35FYEECDQ/

Summary: This article examines the lobbying efforts of major technology companies in New Zealand and their financial relationships with public watchdogs like Netsafe. It questions whether funding from companies like Meta influences these organizations’ stances on regulations, particularly concerning social media and young people, and highlights examples of big tech’s direct lobbying access to government.

Bryce Edwards: “What business is lobbying government for” NZ Herald, 9 October 2024.

URL: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/what-business-is-lobbying-government-for-bryce-edwards-political-roundup/JN5ONDVFPRFGVMMRET3NF7FBYQ/

Summary: Analysis of business lobby priorities revealed through the Herald’s Mood of the Boardroom survey.

Bryce Edwards: “The Silent Death of Lobbying Reform in NZ.” 5 March 2025.

URL: https://theintegrityinstitute.substack.com/p/integrity-briefing-the-silent-death

Summary: An Integrity Briefing column reporting on how a government workstream, promised to address lobbying regulation, was quietly discontinued or shelved, signaling a setback for reform efforts.

Bryce Edwards: “How dairy lobbyists get their way in the Beehive.” 3 April 2025.

URL: https://theintegrityinstitute.substack.com/p/integrity-briefing-how-dairy-lobbyists

Summary: This piece explains the significant influence the dairy industry wields on policy in New Zealand, exemplified by instances such as a former lobbyist for the sector becoming the minister in charge of that same sector, illustrating deep-rooted connections and effective lobbying strategies.

Bryce Edwards: “Andrew Hoggard’s conflicts of interest and NZ’s culture of complacency.” 4 April 2025.

URL: https://theintegrityinstitute.substack.com/p/integrity-briefing-andrew-hoggards

Summary: This article investigates a specific case involving a minister (Andrew Hoggard, a former lobbyist) facing questions about potential conflicts of interest due to lobbying activities by a family member within his portfolio responsibilities. It critiques New Zealand’s broader culture of complacency regarding such ethical issues.

Bryce Edwards: “Launching the NZ Lobbying & Influence Register.” The Integrity Institute (Substack), 7 April 2025.

URL: https://theintegrityinstitute.substack.com/p/integrity-briefing-launching-the

Summary: This piece announces the launch of The Integrity Institute’s independent public register of lobbyists and influencers, a non-governmental initiative aimed at increasing transparency in the absence of official regulation.

Bryce Edwards: “Dirty Politics 2.0? Lobbying in the Shadows” 13 April 2025

URL: https://theintegrityinstitute.substack.com/p/integrity-briefing-dirty-politics

Summary: Exposes The Campaign Company (owned by Taxpayers’ Union’s Jordan Williams) as the force behind controversial attack billboards targeting Green MPs. Details how the company specializes in “astroturfing” – creating professionally engineered campaigns disguised as grassroots movements for clients including Groundswell, Hobson’s Pledge, and Big Tobacco. Edwards announces the company’s inclusion in a new public lobbying register to increase transparency.

Bryce Edwards: “Banking lobbyists 1, Justice 0.” 15 April 2025.

URL: https://theintegrityinstitute.substack.com/p/integrity-briefing-banking-lobbyists

Summary: This column highlights a specific instance of lobbying success, where banking industry lobbyists reportedly influenced the government to retrospectively change legislation in their favour, thereby preventing a potential class-action lawsuit. It serves as a case study of powerful lobbying overriding other interests.

Bryce Edwards: “Lobbying reform battle heats up.” 15 April 2025.

URL: https://theintegrityinstitute.substack.com/p/integrity-briefing-lobbying-reform

Summary: An analysis of the growing momentum and intensified debate surrounding lobbying reform in New Zealand. It likely notes the efforts of The Integrity Institute and the emergence of new coalitions or prominent figures advocating for regulatory changes.

Bryce Edwards: “Verrall’s Tobacco Bill – a chink of light in the lobbying gloom.” 18 May 2025.

URL: https://theintegrityinstitute.substack.com/p/integrity-briefing-verralls-tobacco

Summary: This article discusses a specific instance where public-interest legislation, namely Ayesha Verrall’s smokefree measures, managed to advance despite significant lobbying pressure from opposing interests, offering a rare positive example in the context of lobbying influence.

Bryce Edwards: “A case study in the dark arts of lobbying.” The Integrity Institute (Substack), 20 May 2025.

URL: https://theintegrityinstitute.substack.com/p/integrity-briefing-a-case-study-in

Summary: This piece likely presents a detailed case study, for example, concerning the retirement village industry or a similar sector, to illustrate the often hidden and sophisticated tactics employed by lobbyists to influence policy and public opinion.

Part Two: Works by Guyon Espiner

Guyon Espiner, an investigative journalist for Radio New Zealand (RNZ), has produced seminal work exposing the mechanics and impact of lobbying in New Zealand. His “Mate, Comrade, Brother” series was particularly influential.

Guyon Espiner: “Lobbying firms earning hundreds of thousands from contracts with government agencies.” RNZ, 20 March 2023.

URL: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/in-depth/486312/lobbying-firms-earning-hundreds-of-thousands-from-contracts-with-government-agencies

Summary: Part of the “Mate, Comrade, Brother” series, this investigation reveals that universities, government agencies, and State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) spend significant public funds on lobbying firms, sometimes for political intelligence on MPs or media management. It highlights New Zealand’s unregulated lobbying environment and provides examples of firms like Thompson Lewis and Draper Cormack Group and their work for entities like Transpower and Pharmac.

Guyon Espiner: “How well-connected lobbyists ask for – and receive – urgent meetings, sensitive information and action on law changes for their corporate clients.” RNZ 23 March 2023.

URL: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/lobbying/486527/how-well-connected-lobbyists-ask-for-and-receive-urgent-meetings-sensitive-information-and-action-on-law-changes-for-their-corporate-clients

Summary: This article, part of the “Mate, Comrade, Brother” series, uses emails, texts, and Signal messages to expose how lobbyists leverage personal connections with ministerial advisors and ministers to gain urgent meetings, access sensitive information, and influence law changes for corporate clients. It underscores the informality and effectiveness of these connections in New Zealand’s weakly regulated system.

Guyon Espiner: “Lobbyists in New Zealand enjoy freedoms unlike most other nations in the developed world.” RNZ, 24 March 2023.1

URL: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/lobbying/486670/lobbyists-in-new-zealand-enjoy-freedoms-unlike-most-other-nations-in-the-developed-world

Summary: This report contrasts New Zealand’s unregulated lobbying landscape with stricter regimes in countries like Australia, Canada, and the US. It highlights the lack of a public register, disclosure requirements, or cooling-off periods, making NZ an outlier and contributing to a lack of transparency and accountability.

Guyon Espiner: “Prime Minister’s chief of staff Andrew Kirton led lobbying firm that fought against reforms now binned by Chris Hipkins.” RNZ 21 March 2023

URL: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/prime-ministers-chief-of-staff-andrew-kirton-led-lobbying-firm-that-fought-against-reforms-now-binned-by-chris-hipkins/FPPZ3RTX3VGOXPY4OKAYEKUGUI/ 

Summary: This investigation reveals that Andrew Kirton, before becoming Prime Minister Chris Hipkins’ chief of staff, headed a lobbying firm (Anacta) that worked for liquor companies opposing a container return scheme. Shortly after Kirton’s appointment, the government ditched these reforms. The article questions potential conflicts of interest and the lack of “cool off” periods for individuals moving between lobbying and government roles.

Guyon Espiner and Mediawatch: “Lifting the lid on lobbying, ministers – and the media.” RNZ, 26 March 2023.

URL: https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/mediawatch/audio/2018883296/lifting-the-lid-on-lobbying-ministers-and-the-media

Summary: This episode discusses RNZ’s investigation (led by Guyon Espiner) into lobbyists and their communications with politicians, highlighting the lack of public oversight. It also examines the media’s role, including how lobbyists appear in media without disclosing clients, and features excerpts from Espiner’s book The Drinking Game concerning alcohol industry influence.

Guyon Espiner: “’Astonishment’ at lobbyists advising Transparency International on ethics and rules of their own industry.” RNZ, 24 July 2023.

URL: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/in-depth/494351/astonishment-at-lobbyists-advising-transparency-international-on-ethics-and-rules-of-their-own-industry

Summary: This article reports on Transparency International New Zealand (TINZ) setting up a secret group of lobbyists to advise on improving ethics in the lobbying industry. This move sparked criticism and claims of TINZ being captured by the interests it aims to regulate, particularly given New Zealand’s lack of formal lobbying regulations.

Guyon Espiner: “Lobbying firm’s ‘wildly inappropriate’ contracts at Commerce Commission revealed.” RNZ, 7 November 2023.

URL: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/in-depth/501838/lobbying-and-communications-firm-senate-s-wildly-inappropriate-contracts-at-commerce-commission-revealed

Summary: An exposé on the PR and lobbying firm SenateSHJ being embedded within the Commerce Commission, working on sensitive competition policy areas while also representing clients in those same sectors. This raised significant conflict of interest concerns and questions about the integrity of regulatory processes.

Guyon Espiner: “Lobbyists are back at Parliament – with more secrecy.” RNZ, 12 February 2024.

URL: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/508901/lobbyists-are-back-at-parliament-with-more-secrecy

Summary: This report details how Speaker Gerry Brownlee quietly restored lobbyists’ swipe card access to Parliament and decided to keep the lobbyist visitor list secret. It illustrates how transparency measures can be rolled back, increasing opacity around lobbying activities.

Guyon Espiner: “David Seymour’s whole-of-society plan for tipping millions of dollars more in to Pharmac and Big Pharma.” RNZ, 12 August 2024.

URL: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/in-depth/524848/david-seymour-s-whole-of-society-plan-for-tipping-millions-of-dollars-more-in-to-pharmac-and-big-pharma

Summary: While not solely about lobbying, this article investigates a significant policy proposal related to pharmaceutical funding, an area historically subject to intense lobbying by “Big Pharma.” It explores the potential impacts and beneficiaries of increased funding for Pharmac, which often involves interactions with pharmaceutical company lobbyists.

Guyon Espiner: “Alcohol lobbyists given input on health policies, documents reveal.” RNZ, 9 May 2025.

URL: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/in-depth/560404/alcohol-lobbyists-given-input-on-health-policies-documents-reveal

Summary: This investigation reveals that alcohol industry lobbyists were consulted on the development of health policies, including strategies for Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) and the allocation of the alcohol levy. It highlights conflicts of interest and instances where industry complaints led to changes on official health websites.

Part Three: Other Significant Media Commentary and Analysis

This section includes insightful articles and commentary from other journalists and experts who have contributed to the public understanding of lobbying in New Zealand.

Branko Marcetic: “The influence machine: how an American neoliberal lobby group operates in NZ”. Spinoff 18 May 2017

URL: https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/18-05-2017/the-influence-machine-how-an-american-neoliberal-lobbying-group-operates-in-nz

Summary: Investigates the American Chamber of Commerce in New Zealand (AmCham) and its close coordination with MFAT to promote the Trans-Pacific Partnership in the US. Using OIA emails, reveals how AmCham and the New Zealand government worked together on lobbying strategies and messaging for US Congresspeople. Questions whose interests are served when government agencies collaborate closely with foreign corporate lobbying groups.

Asher Emanuel: “Conflict of interest concerns over lobbyist turned chief of Jacinda Ardern’s staff”. Spinoff 22 February 2018

URL: https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/22-02-2018/conflict-of-interest-concerns-over-lobbyist-turned-chief-of-jacinda-arderns-staff

Summary: This article focuses on the appointment of an individual with a lobbying background to a high-level position as Chief of Staff for then-Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern. Emanuel discusses the conflict of interest concerns arising from this move, exploring how the appointee’s past and present connections could influence government decisions and policy. It highlights the ethical questions and potential for perceived or actual bias when individuals transition directly from lobbying into senior governmental advisory roles.

Sam Sachdeva: “Behind the story: Lobbying and the backdoor of our democracy.” Newsroom RNZ, 22 March 2023.

URL: https://www.rnz.co.nz/programmes/the-detail/story/2018882846/behind-the-story-lobbying-and-the-backdoor-of-our-democracy

Summary: This in-depth piece discusses New Zealand’s “utterly unregulated” lobbying environment and its problematic nature. It draws on Guyon Espiner’s ‘Mates, Comrades, Brothers’ series, contrasting NZ’s lack of rules with Australia’s mandatory register and code of conduct. It highlights the secrecy surrounding lobbyists’ clients and dealings, and the difficulty in obtaining full information via OIA requests.

Kirsty Johnston: “Crown vs Cow: The inside story of how we failed to regulate our worst climate polluter.” RNZ, 17 August 2023.

URL: https://www.rnz.co.nz/programmes/in-depth-special-projects/story/2018902262/crown-vs-cow-the-inside-story-of-how-we-failed-to-regulate-our-worst-climate-polluter

Summary: Part one of a series investigating how New Zealand’s agriculture industry, the country’s largest greenhouse gas emitter, successfully lobbied against effective climate change regulations. It details the formation of the Farming Leaders Group and their influence on the Labour government, leading to the “He Waka Eke Noa” proposal, which was seen by critics as a way to delay meaningful emissions pricing.

Johnston, Kirsty. “Crown vs Cow part two: How agriculture and government fell out, and the climate lost.” RNZ, 18 August 2023.

URL: https://www.rnz.co.nz/programmes/in-depth-special-projects/story/2018902908/crown-vs-cow-part-two-how-agriculture-and-government-fell-out-and-the-climate-lost

Summary: This article details the breakdown of the “He Waka Eke Noa” partnership between the government and the agriculture industry. It explores disagreements over emissions pricing mechanisms, allocation methods, and sequestration, ultimately leading to industry backlash against the government’s proposals and the effective demise of the plan to price agricultural emissions by 2025.

Boyd Swinburn: “New Zealand: no place for anti-health lobbying.” Newsroom, 22 August 2023.

URL: https://newsroom.co.nz/2023/08/22/nz-no-place-for-anti-health-lobbying/

Summary: An opinion piece by public health expert Professor Boyd Swinburn arguing that corporate lobbying, particularly by the food, alcohol, and tobacco industries, has significantly impeded health reforms in New Zealand. He critiques the “chilling effect” on health sector advocacy and the “diminished homogenised public health voice” in the face of powerful, non-transparent industry lobbying, calling for stronger safeguards.

Sam Sachdeva: “Govt criticised for go-slow on lobbying reform” (Newsroom, 5 Mar 2025.

URL: https://newsroom.co.nz/2025/03/05/govt-go-slow-on-lobbying-reform-criticised/

Summary: A news feature discussing how, two years after the government promised action, New Zealand remains “utterly unregulated” in terms of lobbying rules. Sachdeva outlines frustration from experts at the lack of progress and notes that the current Justice Minister (Paul Goldsmith) has indicated lobbying regulation is “not a priority,” heightening concerns that vested interests continue to wield unchecked influence .

Part Four: Academic and Research Resources

This section lists key reports and academic contributions that provide structured analysis and reform proposals concerning lobbying in New Zealand.

Helen Clark Foundation: Shining a Light: Improving Transparency in New Zealand’s Political and Governance Systems (2023)

URL: https://helenclark.foundation/publications-and-medias/shining-a-light/

Summary: A research report by Philippa Yasbek (released Aug 2024) examining New Zealand’s rising perceived corruption risks and lack of transparency. It covers five key areas – including political lobbying and political donations – and highlights NZ’s shortcomings in regulating lobbyists. The report recommends a suite of changes to strengthen transparency (such as a lobbying register and stricter rules around the “revolving door” and political funding) to safeguard democracy.

Health Coalition Aotearoa: “Proposals for lobbying reform.” April 2025

URL: https://www.healthcoalition.org.nz/campaigns/regulate-lobbying/

Summary: Health Coalition Aotearoa (HCA), in partnership with the Helen Clark Foundation and Transparency International NZ, launched the “Let’s Level the Playing Field” campaign. Their proposals include a five-point plan for lobbying reform: 1) Regulate lobbying (public register, mandatory code of conduct, Integrity Commission); 2) Slow the revolving door (cooling-off period); 3) Manage conflicts of interest (stronger codes for officials); 4) Strengthen transparency laws (modernised OIA); 5) Tighten political donation rules. These proposals aim to bring New Zealand in line with international best practices.

Max Rashbrooke: “A Balance of Voices: options for the regulation of lobbying in New Zealand.” Health Coalition Aotearoa, March 2024.

URL: https://www.healthcoalition.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Options_for_lobbying_regulation.pdf

Summary: This comprehensive report, commissioned by Health Coalition Aotearoa, examines options for regulating lobbying in New Zealand. It reviews past regulatory attempts, international approaches, and local research. Key recommendations include enacting a “Regulation of Lobbying Act,” establishing a publicly accessible register of lobbying activity, imposing stand-down periods for former officials, implementing mandatory codes of conduct, and creating an independent regulatory agency (Lobbying or Integrity Commission). The report emphasizes defining lobbyists and lobbying activity effectively and considering Te Tiriti o Waitangi obligations.

Sir David Skegg: “The Health of the People.” Bridget Williams Books, 2019.

URL: Information about the book can be found via booksellers and libraries.

(Specific URL for the book itself is not applicable for a bibliography entry of this type).

Summary: This book by eminent epidemiologist Sir David Skegg discusses, among other public health issues, the detrimental impact of lobbying on public health policy in New Zealand. It details how the Ministry of Health’s focus shifted from public health to personal health services and how the independent Public Health Commission was abolished due to lobbying from alcohol, tobacco, business, and farming interests. The book also highlights how lobbying stymied improvements in areas like drinking water standards and food safety, and notes the Ministry of Health’s lack of preparedness for a pandemic.

Ministry of Justice. “Political Lobbying Project.” Ministry of Justice New Zealand, ongoing since April 2023.

URL: https://www.justice.govt.nz/justice-sector-policy/key-initiatives/political-lobbying/

Summary: This official project page details the Ministry of Justice’s work on lobbying in New Zealand, initiated in April 2023. The project has two main streams: supporting third-party lobbyists to develop a voluntary code of conduct and undertaking a review of policy options for regulating lobbying activities. The page provides access to project overviews, ministerial briefings, draft codes of conduct, consultation feedback summaries, meeting summaries with various stakeholders (including government relations consultants, academics, transparency groups, industry associations, and Iwi/Māori), and regular project updates. It reflects the official process of considering lobbying reform in New Zealand.